Rockefeller v. Carter

657 F. App'x 209
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 3, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1796
StatusPublished

This text of 657 F. App'x 209 (Rockefeller v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rockefeller v. Carter, 657 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Aurora Julian Rockefeller appeals the district court’s orders adopting the recommendation of the ■ magistrate judge and dismissing her civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Rockefeller v. Carter, No. 2:14-cv-07528, 2016 WL 661537 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 18, 2016; May 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
657 F. App'x 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockefeller-v-carter-ca4-2016.