Rockefeller Tech. Invs. (ASIA) v. Changzhou Sinotype Tech. Co.
426 P.3d 303, 238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 118
This text of 426 P.3d 303 (Rockefeller Tech. Invs. (ASIA) v. Changzhou Sinotype Tech. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rockefeller Tech. Invs. (ASIA) v. Changzhou Sinotype Tech. Co., 426 P.3d 303, 238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 118 (Cal. 2018).
Opinion
The petition for review is granted. The parties are to brief and argue the following issue: Can private parties contractually agree to legal service of process by methods not expressly authorized by the Hague Convention?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
426 P.3d 303, 238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockefeller-tech-invs-asia-v-changzhou-sinotype-tech-co-cal-2018.