Rockaway Point Co. v. Friberg

198 A.D. 923
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1921·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order of the county judge of Queens county of May 23, 1921, modified by providing that the execution of the warrant to be issued under the final order herein shall be stayed as to any portion of the demised premises actually used and occupied by the tenant as a dwelling; and as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. We think that the tenant is entitled to the protection of chapter 942, Laws of 1920,* as to such portion of the demised premises as are actually used and occupied as a dwelling by himself and his family. His right to occupy the premises for business purposes terminated with the final order. Rich, Putnam, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concur; Blaekmar, P. J., dissents on the ground that the situation here disclosed does not present a case within the scope and meaning of the September rent laws. Settle order on notice.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rockaway Point Co. v. Friberg, 198 A.D. 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

198 A.D. 923 (Rockaway Point Co. v. Friberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Xu v. Suffolk County
E.D. New York, 2021
Morgenroth v. Emert
118 Misc. 260 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)