Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Ninth Circuit

Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr.. Read the opinion of the Court — 707 F.3d 1081 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 31, 2012·No. 09-71571·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROCIO BRENDA HENRIQUEZ-RIVAS,  Petitioner, No. 09-71571 v.  Agency No. A098-660-718 ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed January 31, 2012

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROCIO BRENDA HENRIQUEZ-RIVAS,  Petitioner, No. 09-71571 v.  Agency No. A098-660-718 ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed January 31, 2012

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr., (9th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr. (Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.