Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Ninth Circuit

Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 31, 2012

Docket09-71571

StatusPublished

This text of Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr. (Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr., (9th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROCIO BRENDA HENRIQUEZ-RIVAS,  Petitioner, No. 09-71571 v.  Agency No. A098-660-718 ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed January 31, 2012

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROCIO BRENDA HENRIQUEZ-RIVAS,  Petitioner, No. 09-71571 v.  Agency No. A098-660-718 ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed January 31, 2012

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocio-henriquez-rivas-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2012.