Rochowiak v. State
89 So. 3d 1085, 2012 WL 2051101, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9191
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 8, 2012
DocketNos. 5D11-3061, 5D11-3072, 5D11-3277, 5D11-3279, 5D11-3373, 5D11-3374, 5D11-3378, 5D11-3381, 5D11-3592, 5D11-3593, 5D11-3594, 5D11-3596, 5D11-3597, 5D11-3598, 5D11-3599, 5D11-3613, 5D11-3705, 5D11-3706, 5D11-3707, 5D11-3708, 5D11-3709, 5D11-3710
StatusPublished
This text of 89 So. 3d 1085 (Rochowiak v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rochowiak v. State, 89 So. 3d 1085, 2012 WL 2051101, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9191 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We certify that the same issue reviewed in each of these consolidated cases is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). The mandates will be withheld pending final disposition of Adkins.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Flagg v. State
74 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
71 So. 3d 117 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
89 So. 3d 1085, 2012 WL 2051101, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rochowiak-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.