Rochon v. Cain

Supreme Court

Rochon v. Cain

176 L. Ed. 2d 1216, 130 S. Ct. 3325, 560 U.S. 921, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4313, 78 U.S.L.W. 3688

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 24, 2010·No. No. 09-9687·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit, dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305, and cases cited therein.

Same case below, 6 So. 3d 890.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit, dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305, and cases cited therein.

Same case below, 6 So. 3d 890.

Rochon v. Cain, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1216, 130 S. Ct. 3325, 560 U.S. 921, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4313, 78 U.S.L.W. 3688 (U.S. 2010).

Pincite

176 L. Ed. 2d 1216 (Rochon v. Cain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related