Rochkind v. Jacobson

126 A.D. 357, 110 N.Y.S. 583, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3351
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 1, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 126 A.D. 357 (Rochkind v. Jacobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rochkind v. Jacobson, 126 A.D. 357, 110 N.Y.S. 583, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinions

Hooker, J.:

The action is to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien on real property. The complaint alleges substantial performance. The plaintiffs, had judgment. The contract price was $3,100. There has been allowed to the defendant $314 for work which the plaintiffs have not performed in order to complete the contract. This is more than ten per cent of the contract price. Waiver of substantial performance is neither plead in the complaint nor proved by any satisfactory evidence. Under ordinary circumstances, and those in the record are not extraordinary, a failure to perform ten per cent of the contract price will not admit of the claim of substantial performance.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Woodward, Jenks and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cassino v. Yacevich
261 A.D. 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
North American Wall Paper Co. v. Jackson Construction Co.
167 A.D. 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Rochkind v. Jacobson
122 N.Y.S. 1143 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Fuchs v. Saladino
133 A.D. 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 A.D. 357, 110 N.Y.S. 583, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rochkind-v-jacobson-nyappdiv-1908.