Rochis v. Milascewicz

211 Ill. App. 262
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided May 14, 1918·No. Gen. No. 23,609·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Insurance, § 67* — what is not negligence tarring recovery for breach of contract by broker to procure. In an action against an insurance broker for breach of a contract to procure fire insurance, the fact that plaintiff waited 4 weeks after he had been assured by the defendant that the policy had been sent for but had not arrived without attempting to procure insurance elsewhere was not negligence barring recovery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rochis v. Milascewicz, 211 Ill. App. 262 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

211 Ill. App. 262 (Rochis v. Milascewicz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ward v. Moore
9 Ohio Law. Abs. 439 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1930)
Mosteiko v. National Inter Insurers Corp.
229 Ill. App. 153 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)