Rochis v. Milascewicz

211 Ill. App. 262
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMay 14, 1918
DocketGen. No. 23,609
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 211 Ill. App. 262 (Rochis v. Milascewicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rochis v. Milascewicz, 211 Ill. App. 262 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Insurance, § 67* — what is not negligence tarring recovery for breach of contract by broker to procure. In an action against an insurance broker for breach of a contract to procure fire insurance, the fact that plaintiff waited 4 weeks after he had been assured by the defendant that the policy had been sent for but had not arrived without attempting to procure insurance elsewhere was not negligence barring recovery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ward v. Moore
9 Ohio Law. Abs. 439 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1930)
Mosteiko v. National Inter Insurers Corp.
229 Ill. App. 153 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 Ill. App. 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rochis-v-milascewicz-illappct-1918.