Rochester v. South Carolina
This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 5 (Rochester v. South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 L. Ed. 2d 5, 132 S. Ct. 376, 565 U.S. 804, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6397, 80 U.S.L.W. 3192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rochester-v-south-carolina-scotus-2011.