Rochester v. South Carolina

Supreme Court

Rochester v. South Carolina

181 L. Ed. 2d 5, 132 S. Ct. 376, 565 U.S. 804, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6397, 80 U.S.L.W. 3192

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 3, 2011·No. No. 10-10964·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Rochester v. South Carolina, 181 L. Ed. 2d 5, 132 S. Ct. 376, 565 U.S. 804, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6397, 80 U.S.L.W. 3192 (U.S. 2011).

Pincite

181 L. Ed. 2d 5 (Rochester v. South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related