Rochester v. Bergen

New York Court of Appeals

Rochester v. Bergen

51 N.E.2d 933, 291 N.Y. 656, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1754

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 14, 1943

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 N.E.2d 933 (Rochester v. Bergen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rochester v. Bergen, 51 N.E.2d 933, 291 N.Y. 656, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1754 (N.Y. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Paragraph 3 of the agreement is invalid. Paragraph 2 is inseparable from paragraph 3 and falls with it. There has been no refusal or failure to perform any other provision of the agreement. The judgment appealed from denying specific performance and dismissing the complaint is therefore affirmed, with costs.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI