Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Stull
This text of 239 A.D. 764 (Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Stull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Finding of fact contained in defendant Stull’s request No. 5 disapproved and reversed as without evidence to support it. (See New York Life Ins. Co. v. Casey, 178 N. Y. 381; Rafel v. Maurer, 101 Misc. 621; affd., 183 App. Div. 931; York City & County Banking Co. v. Bainbridge, 43 L. T. Rep. [N. S.] 732; Schroyer v. Thompson, 262 Penn. St. 282; Claiborne v. Birge, 42 Tex. 98.) All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for reversal of the judgment as to the appellant Stull, on the law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rochester-trust-safe-deposit-co-v-stull-nyappdiv-1933.