Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Hatch

248 A.D. 669

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Hatch. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 A.D. 945 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten doUars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies motion to compel service of an amended complaint in an action on a bond secured by a mortgage on realty.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Hatch, 248 A.D. 669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 669 (Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Hatch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.