Rochester Telephone Corp. v. Public Service Commission

447 N.E.2d 40, 58 N.Y.2d 874, 460 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2859
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 10, 1983·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[876] OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division correctly held that the commission did not have the authority, under subdivision 2 of section 113 of the Public Service Law, to order the petitioner to pass on to its customers the tax deduction resulting from its passing on of a tax refund. We express no opinion on whether the commission, in ruling on a general rate case, may order a passing on of the tax deduction, a question we need not reach on this appeal.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rochester Telephone Corp. v. Public Service Commission, 447 N.E.2d 40, 58 N.Y.2d 874, 460 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2859 (N.Y. 1983).

447 N.E.2d 40 (Rochester Telephone Corp. v. Public Service Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Public Service Commission
194 Misc. 2d 467 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Public Service Commission
507 N.E.2d 287 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Public Service Commission
118 A.D.2d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)