Rochester Photo Works, Inc. v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rochester Photo Works, Inc. v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.

173 A.D. 919

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

The appeal from the order entered June 15, 1915, is dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the defendant having availed itself of the order and proceeded with the examination has waived the right to appeal. The order entered January 10, 1916, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a motion by defendant for a further modification of the order for the examination if so advised. Held, that on the testimony given before the referee we cannot say that the Special Term erred in construing the order for examination as modified. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appeal from the order entered June 15, 1915, is dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the defendant having availed itself of the order and proceeded with the examination has waived the right to appeal. The order entered January 10, 1916, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a motion by defendant for a further modification of the order for the examination if so advised. Held, that on the testimony given before the referee we cannot say that the Special Term erred in construing the order for examination as modified. All concurred.

Rochester Photo Works, Inc. v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co., 173 A.D. 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

173 A.D. 919 (Rochester Photo Works, Inc. v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.