Rochester Coach Lace Co. v. Schaefer

50 F. 106, 1 C.C.A. 488, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1234
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 18, 1892·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are entirely satisfied with the conclusions reached by the. learned district judge who decided this case in the circuit court, as expressed in his opinion. The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rochester Coach Lace Co. v. Schaefer, 50 F. 106, 1 C.C.A. 488, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1234 (2d Cir. 1892).

50 F. 106 (Rochester Coach Lace Co. v. Schaefer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

H. W. Johns Manuf'g Co. v. Robertson
60 F. 900 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1894)
Bowman v. De Grauw
60 F. 907 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1894)