Roche v. United States

116 F. 911, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5051
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedMay 13, 1902
DocketNo. 2,978
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 116 F. 911 (Roche v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roche v. United States, 116 F. 911, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5051 (circtsdny 1902).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the board of general appraisers is affirmed, for the reason that paragraph 559 of the tariff act of 1897 is expressly not applicable to fruits specially provided for in the act, and, on the contrary, paragraph 266 is not qualified by any such language.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brennan v. United States
136 F. 743 (First Circuit, 1905)
Brennan v. United States
129 F. 837 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 F. 911, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roche-v-united-states-circtsdny-1902.