Roche v. United States

116 F. 911, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5051
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided May 13, 1902·No. No. 2,978·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the board of general appraisers is affirmed, for the reason that paragraph 559 of the tariff act of 1897 is expressly not applicable to fruits specially provided for in the act, and, on the contrary, paragraph 266 is not qualified by any such language.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roche v. United States, 116 F. 911, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5051 (circtsdny 1902).

116 F. 911 (Roche v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brennan v. United States
136 F. 743 (First Circuit, 1905)
Brennan v. United States
129 F. 837 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1904)