Roche v. Roche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roche v. Roche

254 A.D. 874, 4 N.Y.S.2d 929, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8123

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 6, 1938·Published

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff vrife’s motion for an order to increase alimony payments from the rate of twenty dollars a week to thirty dollars a week reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, directing defendant tojpay to plaintiff as alimony the sum of thirty dollars a week commencing as of the 1st day of January, 1938, without costs. In view of defendant’s improved financial situation, the increase in alimony is not unreasonable. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff vrife’s motion for an order to increase alimony payments from the rate of twenty dollars a week to thirty dollars a week reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, directing defendant tojpay to plaintiff as alimony the sum of thirty dollars a week commencing as of the 1st day of January, 1938, without costs. In view of defendant’s improved financial situation, the increase in alimony is not unreasonable. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Roche v. Roche, 254 A.D. 874, 4 N.Y.S.2d 929, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 874 (Roche v. Roche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.