Roche v. Roche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roche v. Roche

254 A.D. 874, 4 N.Y.S.2d 929, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8123

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 874 (Roche v. Roche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roche v. Roche, 254 A.D. 874, 4 N.Y.S.2d 929, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff vrife’s motion for an order to increase alimony payments from the rate of twenty dollars a week to thirty dollars a week reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, directing defendant tojpay to plaintiff as alimony the sum of thirty dollars a week commencing as of the 1st day of January, 1938, without costs. In view of defendant’s improved financial situation, the increase in alimony is not unreasonable. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff vrife’s motion for an order to increase alimony payments from the rate of twenty dollars a week to thirty dollars a week reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, directing defendant tojpay to plaintiff as alimony the sum of thirty dollars a week commencing as of the 1st day of January, 1938, without costs. In view of defendant’s improved financial situation, the increase in alimony is not unreasonable. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 874, 4 N.Y.S.2d 929, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roche-v-roche-nyappdiv-1938.