Roche v. Haugh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roche v. Haugh

6 A.D.2d 1030, 178 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4643

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 1030 (Roche v. Haugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roche v. Haugh, 6 A.D.2d 1030, 178 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4643 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to make a new application on competent medical proof based on a recent physical examination. In view of the fact that the defendants have had the advantage of a physical examination of the plaintiff they should, in the event that a new application is made and if they believe that the injuries are not sufficiently serious to warrant the granting of a preference, submit an affidavit by their examining doctor. Concur—Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to make a new application on competent medical proof based on a recent physical examination. In view of the fact that the defendants have had the advantage of a physical examination of the plaintiff they should, in the event that a new application is made and if they believe that the injuries are not sufficiently serious to warrant the granting of a preference, submit an affidavit by their examining doctor. Concur—Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 1030, 178 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roche-v-haugh-nyappdiv-1958.