Roche v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided June 17, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-00234·Unknown

Opinion

Robyn M. Rebers, OSB# 034309 Robyn M. Rebers LLC PO Box 3530 Wilsonville, OR 97070 Tel: 503-871-8890 Fax: 888-398-8793 robyn@reberslaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

SUSAN M. ROCHE, CV No.: 3:20-cv-00234-YY

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR EAJA FEES v.

ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. ________________________________

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and 28 U.S.C. § 1920, it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney’s fees of $8,872.21 and costs in the amount of $400.00, for a total of $9,272.21, shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees and costs are not subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees and costs shall be made payable to attorney Robyn M. Rebers, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to her attorney. If it is determined that Plaintiff has debt subject to the Treasury Offset Program, then the check for the remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made payable to Plaintiff. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel, Robyn Rebers, at P.O. Box 3530, Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this _1_7_t_h day of ___J_u_n_e______, 2021. ____/_s_/ _Y_o_u_l_e_e_ Y_i_m__ Y__o_u__________ YOULEE YIM YOU United States Magistrate Judge Presented by: Robyn M. Rebers OSB# 034309 Attorney for Plaintiff

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roche v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2021).

Roche v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Roche v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)