Roche v. Baker

115 A.D.3d 1239, 982 N.Y.S.2d 425

This text of 115 A.D.3d 1239 (Roche v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roche v. Baker, 115 A.D.3d 1239, 982 N.Y.S.2d 425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Steuben County Court (Peter C. Bradstreet, J.), entered January 10, 2013. The order denied the application of petitioner to quash a subpoena duces tecum.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by petitioner-appellant on December 19, 2013, by respondent-respondent on December 18, 2013 and by the attorney for petitioner-appellant on December 17, 2013,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Lindley, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 A.D.3d 1239, 982 N.Y.S.2d 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roche-v-baker-nyappdiv-2014.