Roche v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roche v. Baker

115 A.D.3d 1239, 982 N.Y.S.2d 425

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2014·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Steuben County Court (Peter C. Bradstreet, J.), entered January 10, 2013. The order denied the application of petitioner to quash a subpoena duces tecum.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by petitioner-appellant on December 19, 2013, by respondent-respondent on December 18, 2013 and by the attorney for petitioner-appellant on December 17, 2013,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Lindley, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Steuben County Court (Peter C. Bradstreet, J.), entered January 10, 2013. The order denied the application of petitioner to quash a subpoena duces tecum.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by petitioner-appellant on December 19, 2013, by respondent-respondent on December 18, 2013 and by the attorney for petitioner-appellant on December 17, 2013,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Lindley, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.

Roche v. Baker, 115 A.D.3d 1239, 982 N.Y.S.2d 425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

115 A.D.3d 1239 (Roche v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.