ROCHE, PHILIP J. v. BAKER, BROOKS T.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
282 CA 13-01682 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP J. ROCHE, PUBLIC DEFENDER, COUNTY OF STEUBEN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
V ORDER
BROOKS T. BAKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, COUNTY OF STEUBEN, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
ALAN P. REED, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BATH, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
BROOKS T. BAKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATH, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT PRO SE.
Appeal from an order of the Steuben County Court (Peter C. Bradstreet, J.), entered January 10, 2013. The order denied the application of petitioner to quash a subpoena duces tecum.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by petitioner-appellant on December 19, 2013, by respondent- respondent on December 18, 2013 and by the attorney for petitioner- appellant on December 17, 2013,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: March 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ROCHE, PHILIP J. v. BAKER, BROOKS T. (ROCHE, PHILIP J. v. BAKER, BROOKS T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.