ROCHE, PHILIP J. v. BAKER, BROOKS T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2014·No. CA 13-01682·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

282 CA 13-01682 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP J. ROCHE, PUBLIC DEFENDER, COUNTY OF STEUBEN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

BROOKS T. BAKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, COUNTY OF STEUBEN, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

ALAN P. REED, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BATH, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

BROOKS T. BAKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATH, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT PRO SE.

Appeal from an order of the Steuben County Court (Peter C. Bradstreet, J.), entered January 10, 2013. The order denied the application of petitioner to quash a subpoena duces tecum.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by petitioner-appellant on December 19, 2013, by respondent- respondent on December 18, 2013 and by the attorney for petitioner- appellant on December 17, 2013,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: March 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROCHE, PHILIP J. v. BAKER, BROOKS T., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

ROCHE, PHILIP J. v. BAKER, BROOKS T. (ROCHE, PHILIP J. v. BAKER, BROOKS T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.