Roche Management Inc. v. Burns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roche Management Inc. v. Burns

275 A.D.2d 404, 712 N.Y.S.2d 882, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8806

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 21, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 275 A.D.2d 404 (Roche Management Inc. v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roche Management Inc. v. Burns, 275 A.D.2d 404, 712 N.Y.S.2d 882, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), entered July 30, 1999, which, upon reargument, granted the motion of the defendant James Carroll to vacate his default in appearing in the action, and denied its cross motion for leave to enter a judgment on that defendant’s default.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted, upon reargument, the motion of the defendant James Carroll to vacate his default in appearing and answering (see, Stone v County of Nassau, 272 AD2d 392; Matter of Long Is. Light. Co. v Assessor of Town of Brookhaven, 251 AD2d 332). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), entered July 30, 1999, which, upon reargument, granted the motion of the defendant James Carroll to vacate his default in appearing in the action, and denied its cross motion for leave to enter a judgment on that defendant’s default.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted, upon reargument, the motion of the defendant James Carroll to vacate his default in appearing and answering (see, Stone v County of Nassau, 272 AD2d 392; Matter of Long Is. Light. Co. v Assessor of Town of Brookhaven, 251 AD2d 332). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 404, 712 N.Y.S.2d 882, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roche-management-inc-v-burns-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack