Rochau v. Dillon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Rochau v. Dillon

1926 OK 395, 245 P. 987, 114 Okla. 228, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 999

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 20, 1926

Docket16590

StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK 395 (Rochau v. Dillon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rochau v. Dillon, 1926 OK 395, 245 P. 987, 114 Okla. 228, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 999 (Okla. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant in error moves the court to dismiss appeal on the ground that same was not filed in this court within six months after date of final order. Motion for a new trial was overruled on the first day of December, 1924, and notice of appeal given and the appeal was filed in this court on the 13th day of July, 1925. Section 798, C. O. S. 1921, provides as follows:

“All proceedings for reversing, vacating or modi.ying judgments, or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of. * * *”

This statute is mandatory, and the appeal not having been filed within the time therein provided, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant in error moves the court to dismiss appeal on the ground that same was not filed in this court within six months after date of final order. Motion for a new trial was overruled on the first day of December, 1924, and notice of appeal given and the appeal was filed in this court on the 13th day of July, 1925. Section 798, C. O. S. 1921, provides as follows:

“All proceedings for reversing, vacating or modi.ying judgments, or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of. * * *”

This statute is mandatory, and the appeal not having been filed within the time therein provided, the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK 395, 245 P. 987, 114 Okla. 228, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rochau-v-dillon-okla-1926.