Rochat v. Rochat

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Rochat v. Rochat

883 P.2d 1338, 131 Or. App. 261, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1575

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 2, 1994·No. 9305-90736; CA A82273·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals from two orders of the Mult-nomah County Circuit Court, one appointing guardians for petitioner and the other appointing conservators. We reject petitioner’s arguments concerning the guardianship. The respondents concede that they did not request a conservator-ship and that the trial court, under the pleadings, should not have appointed conservators.

Order appointing conservators reversed; order appointing guardians affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals from two orders of the Mult-nomah County Circuit Court, one appointing guardians for petitioner and the other appointing conservators. We reject petitioner’s arguments concerning the guardianship. The respondents concede that they did not request a conservator-ship and that the trial court, under the pleadings, should not have appointed conservators.

Order appointing conservators reversed; order appointing guardians affirmed.

Rochat v. Rochat, 883 P.2d 1338, 131 Or. App. 261, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1575 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

883 P.2d 1338 (Rochat v. Rochat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.