Rochat v. Rochat

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Rochat v. Rochat

883 P.2d 1338, 131 Or. App. 261, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1575

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 2, 1994

Docket9305-90736; CA A82273

StatusPublished

This text of 883 P.2d 1338 (Rochat v. Rochat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rochat v. Rochat, 883 P.2d 1338, 131 Or. App. 261, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1575 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals from two orders of the Mult-nomah County Circuit Court, one appointing guardians for petitioner and the other appointing conservators. We reject petitioner’s arguments concerning the guardianship. The respondents concede that they did not request a conservator-ship and that the trial court, under the pleadings, should not have appointed conservators.

Order appointing conservators reversed; order appointing guardians affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals from two orders of the Mult-nomah County Circuit Court, one appointing guardians for petitioner and the other appointing conservators. We reject petitioner’s arguments concerning the guardianship. The respondents concede that they did not request a conservator-ship and that the trial court, under the pleadings, should not have appointed conservators.

Order appointing conservators reversed; order appointing guardians affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

883 P.2d 1338, 131 Or. App. 261, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rochat-v-rochat-orctapp-1994.