Rocha v. State
125 So. 3d 230, 2013 WL 611332, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2797
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 2013·No. No. 4D12-2146·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Juan Alberto Rocha appeals the denial of his Rule 3.800 motion and motion for rehearing, which sought more jail credit than that awarded pursuant to his plea agreement. We affirm. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011) (holding that challenges to plea agreement provisions regarding credit for time served are not cognizable under the rule providing a mechanism for correcting the improper denial of credit for time served, because those challenges present factual questions that cannot be resolved on the basis of the court records).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rocha v. State, 125 So. 3d 230, 2013 WL 611332, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2797 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
125 So. 3d 230 (Rocha v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Amador v. State
112 So. 3d 570 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)