Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rocha v. State

Rocha v. State

125 So. 3d 230, 2013 WL 611332, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2797
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2013
DocketNo. 4D12-2146
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 125 So. 3d 230 (Rocha v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rocha v. State, 125 So. 3d 230, 2013 WL 611332, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2797 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Juan Alberto Rocha appeals the denial of his Rule 3.800 motion and motion for rehearing, which sought more jail credit than that awarded pursuant to his plea agreement. We affirm. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011) (holding that challenges to plea agreement provisions regarding credit for time served are not cognizable under the rule providing a mechanism for correcting the improper denial of credit for time served, because those challenges present factual questions that cannot be resolved on the basis of the court records).

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amador v. State
112 So. 3d 570 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 So. 3d 230, 2013 WL 611332, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocha-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.