Rocha v. INS
This text of Rocha v. INS (Rocha v. INS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-60414 Conference Calendar
HENRY MARTIN ROCHA-BARAHONA,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A26 548 709 - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Henry Martin Rocha-Barahona petitions this court to review
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying his
application to reopen his suspension of deportation proceeding.
Rocha-Barahona contends that he has presented new evidence
showing that his deportation will cause extreme hardship. We
have reviewed the record, the BIA’s decision, and the briefs and
find no abuse of discretion. See Hernandez-Cordero v. INS, 819
F.2d 558, 560 (5th Cir. 1987) (en banc).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-60469 - 2 -
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rocha v. INS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocha-v-ins-ca5-1997.