Rocco v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rocco v. Singletary

729 So. 2d 508, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4615, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 882

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 1999

DocketNo. 99-5

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 729 So. 2d 508 (Rocco v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rocco v. Singletary, 729 So. 2d 508, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4615, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 882 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the state’s proper confession of error, we grant defendant a belated appeal. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979). As the state concedes, defendant’s sentence is not in accord with the plea agreement; the court imposed consecutive rather than concurrent sentences in case number 93-15639. We, therefore, vacate defendant’s sentence. On remand, the trial court is directed to resentence defendant pursuant to the plea agreement to concurrent sentences on counts one and two in ease number 93-15639. The sentence imposed in that case is to run concurrent with the sentence imposed in case number 92-12917.

Habeas granted; sentence vacated; cause remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the state’s proper confession of error, we grant defendant a belated appeal. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979). As the state concedes, defendant’s sentence is not in accord with the plea agreement; the court imposed consecutive rather than concurrent sentences in case number 93-15639. We, therefore, vacate defendant’s sentence. On remand, the trial court is directed to resentence defendant pursuant to the plea agreement to concurrent sentences on counts one and two in ease number 93-15639. The sentence imposed in that case is to run concurrent with the sentence imposed in case number 92-12917.

Habeas granted; sentence vacated; cause remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

729 So. 2d 508, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4615, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocco-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack