Rocca v. Rosenstiel

152 N.E. 677, 20 Ohio App. 367, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 536, 1925 Ohio App. LEXIS 135
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 28, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 N.E. 677 (Rocca v. Rosenstiel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rocca v. Rosenstiel, 152 N.E. 677, 20 Ohio App. 367, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 536, 1925 Ohio App. LEXIS 135 (Ohio Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

EUCHWALTER, P. J.

G. \7. Rosenstiel brought an action in forcible entry and detainer against Anna Rocca in rhe Cincinnati Municipal Court; and recovered judgment on June 19, 1924. On July 80, 1924, a petition in error, transcript, bill of exceptions, etc. were filed in the Hamilton Common pleas. On motion, this court struck the petition in error from the files on the ground that same was not filed by leave of court and tiie proceedings were dismissed.

Error was prosecuted by Rocca to reverse this judgment. The Court of Appeals held:

1. If leave of court is not necessary in order to file a petition in error in a ease of forcible entry and detainer heard in a municipal court, the common pleas court was in error in dismissing Rocca’s petition in error.
2. Section 1558-6 GC. provides that the Municipal Court shall have ordinary civil jurisdiction within the limits of Cincinnati in all actions in forcible entry or detainer.
8. Section 1558-26 provides that proceedings in error may be taken to the Hamilton Common Pleas from a final order of the Cincinnati Municipal Court in the same manner for proceeding’s in error from the common pleas to the court of appeals.
4. Sections 12247 and 12259 GC. provide how cases may be taken from the common pleas to the court of appeals; and leave is not required thereby.
5. Since there is no special statute limiting the right to review the action of the municipal court in forcible entry and detainer cases, provisions of 1558-26, 12247 and 12259 GC. govern the procedure; and the common pleas was in error in dismissing the petition.

Judgment reversed. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Felger v. Thompson
161 N.E. 42 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 N.E. 677, 20 Ohio App. 367, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 536, 1925 Ohio App. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocca-v-rosenstiel-ohioctapp-1925.