Rocamora v. Singleton Shrimp Co.

223 So. 2d 734, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2309
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 1969
DocketNo. 37899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 223 So. 2d 734 (Rocamora v. Singleton Shrimp Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rocamora v. Singleton Shrimp Co., 223 So. 2d 734, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2309 (Fla. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission dated September 13, 1968.

We find upon argument of counsel for the respective parties, consideration of the briefs and the record in this cause that the essential requirements of law have not been violated. It is, therefore, ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., DREW and ADKINS, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur. BOYD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Newell
223 So. 2d 734 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 So. 2d 734, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocamora-v-singleton-shrimp-co-fla-1969.