Roca v. Republic National Bank of Miami
This text of 512 So. 2d 1044 (Roca v. Republic National Bank of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the appeal by Roca, as Director/Trustee of Cibeles Jewelry Group, Inc., a dissolved Florida corporation, we affirm the trial court’s orders striking his claims for conversion, civil theft, and punitive damages. On the cross-appeal by Republic National Bank from a final judgment for Roca on Cibeles’ contract claim, we reverse upon a holding that the trial court erred in excluding expert testimony proffered by the bank as to the custom and practice of the local banking industry, which testimony was intended to elucidate the meaning of the ambiguous language contained in the defendant’s Exhibit A, that is, Cibeles’ acceptance of “all responsibility for the issuance of this guaranty.”
Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 So. 2d 1044, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2179, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roca-v-republic-national-bank-of-miami-fladistctapp-1987.