Roca v. Republic National Bank of Miami

512 So. 2d 1044, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2179, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10163
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 8, 1987·No. Nos. 86-782, 86-792·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the appeal by Roca, as Director/Trustee of Cibeles Jewelry Group, Inc., a dissolved Florida corporation, we affirm the trial court’s orders striking his claims for conversion, civil theft, and punitive damages. On the cross-appeal by Republic National Bank from a final judgment for Roca on Cibeles’ contract claim, we reverse upon a holding that the trial court erred in excluding expert testimony proffered by the bank as to the custom and practice of the local banking industry, which testimony was intended to elucidate the meaning of the ambiguous language contained in the defendant’s Exhibit A, that is, Cibeles’ acceptance of “all responsibility for the issuance of this guaranty.”

Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roca v. Republic National Bank of Miami, 512 So. 2d 1044, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2179, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10163 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

512 So. 2d 1044 (Roca v. Republic National Bank of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nebraska Depository Institution Guaranty Corp. v. Stastny
497 N.W.2d 657 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1993)
REPUBLIC NAT. BANK OF MIAMI, NA v. Roca
534 So. 2d 736 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)