Robyn Lynn Shalit 'Cross-Appellee' v. Michael Lawrence Shalit 'Cross-Appellant'

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 12, 2021
Docket04-19-00736-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Robyn Lynn Shalit 'Cross-Appellee' v. Michael Lawrence Shalit 'Cross-Appellant' (Robyn Lynn Shalit 'Cross-Appellee' v. Michael Lawrence Shalit 'Cross-Appellant') is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robyn Lynn Shalit 'Cross-Appellee' v. Michael Lawrence Shalit 'Cross-Appellant', (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 12, 2021

No. 04-19-00736-CV

Robyn Lynn SHALIT, Appellant/ Cross-Appellee

v.

Michael Lawrence SHALIT, Appellee/ Cross-Appellant

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 11-177 Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On September 29, 2020, we considered the parties’ requests for submission by oral argument, but we set this cause for submission on briefs on November 4, 2020. On further consideration, we withdraw our September 29, 2020 order. We set this cause for submission by oral argument on Thursday, July 8, 2021, at 2:00 p.m., before a panel consisting of Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, and Justice Irene Rios. In accordance with the Texas Supreme Court’s emergency orders in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the oral argument will be held through the Fourth Court of Appeals’ Zoom license. Counsel will receive a separate e-mail that will contain a link for the oral argument. Counsel are admonished as follows: 1. The link to Zoom is only for counsel presenting argument and is not to be shared with any other person. Counsel will need a computer or other electronic device with a camera, a microphone, and access to the Internet. If counsel intends to present any exhibits during oral argument, any such exhibits must be electronically filed by noon on the day before argument. 2. The argument will be live streamed to the Court’s YouTube channel for the benefit of the public. The argument can be accessed using the following link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiaWJQ7eW5OQIALdyLN6s3A 3. Counsel are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the Zoom platform. The Clerk of the Court will contact counsel no later than the week before argument to verify connectivity and equipment. 4. Counsel must wear court-appropriate attire and choose an appropriate background. 5. The time for oral argument will be allotted as follows: Appellant’s/Cross-Appellee’s opening argument 20 Appellee’s/Cross-Appellant’s argument, response 25 Appellant’s/Cross-Appellee’s response, rebuttal 15 Appellee’s/Cross-Appellant’s rebuttal 10 See 4TH TEX. APP. (SAN ANTONIO) LOC. R. 9.1. If any participant’s link is disconnected during argument, timing of the argument will stop until the participant is able to reconnect. If any party no longer wishes to present oral argument, the party must notify this court in writing within seven days of receiving this notice.

It is so ORDERED on May 12, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robyn Lynn Shalit 'Cross-Appellee' v. Michael Lawrence Shalit 'Cross-Appellant', Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robyn-lynn-shalit-cross-appellee-v-michael-lawrence-shalit-texapp-2021.