Roby v. Roby

Fourth Circuit

Roby v. Roby

56 F. App'x 172

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2003·No. No. 02-2023·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Erin Gilland Roby appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying various interlocutory and post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roby v. Roby, No. CA-01-1413-L (D. Md. Jan. 28, 2002; Apr. 5, 2002; Aug. 6, 2002; filed Aug. 14, 2002, entered Aug. 15, 2002; filed Sept. 3, 2002, entered Sept. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Erin Gilland Roby appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying various interlocutory and post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roby v. Roby, No. CA-01-1413-L (D. Md. Jan. 28, 2002; Apr. 5, 2002; Aug. 6, 2002; filed Aug. 14, 2002, entered Aug. 15, 2002; filed Sept. 3, 2002, entered Sept. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Roby v. Roby, 56 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

56 F. App'x 172 (Roby v. Roby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related