Roby v. Horton

999 N.E.2d 694, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1439
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 24, 2013
Docket2013-1697
StatusPublished

This text of 999 N.E.2d 694 (Roby v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roby v. Horton, 999 N.E.2d 694, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

In Procedendo. On complaint in procedendo of Paul Roby. Cause dismissed as moot.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’onnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 N.E.2d 694, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roby-v-horton-ohio-2013.