Roby Trevino Vickers v. State
This text of Roby Trevino Vickers v. State (Roby Trevino Vickers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The clerk's record contains a written waiver of appeal signed by appellant and his attorney. This document reflects a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to appeal and was signed on the day sentence was imposed in open court. A defendant who knowingly and intelligently waives his right to appeal may not thereafter appeal without the consent of the trial court. Ex parte Dickey, 543 S.W.2d 99 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976); see also Hurd v. State, 548 S.W.2d 388 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Reed v. State, 516 S.W.2d 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). There is nothing in the record to indicate that appellant sought or obtained the permission of the trial court to pursue this appeal. Appellant's general notice of appeal is inadequate to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3); see Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 79 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Whitt v. State, 45 S.W.3d 274, 275 (Tex. App.--Austin 2001, no pet.).
The appeal is dismissed.
__________________________________________
Lee Yeakel, Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: May 16, 2002
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roby Trevino Vickers v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roby-trevino-vickers-v-state-texapp-2002.