Robus v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Robus v. Commonwealth

941 A.2d 685, 596 Pa. 170, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 53

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 4, 2008·No. Petition 142 EM 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2008, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Request for Leave to Amend the Petition are GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Request for Appointment of Counsel, the Motion to Quash/Dismiss the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole’s Answer, and the Motion to Quash/Dismiss *171 the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections’ Answer are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2008, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Request for Leave to Amend the Petition are GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Request for Appointment of Counsel, the Motion to Quash/Dismiss the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole’s Answer, and the Motion to Quash/Dismiss *171 the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections’ Answer are DENIED.

Robus v. Commonwealth, 941 A.2d 685, 596 Pa. 170, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 53 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

941 A.2d 685 (Robus v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.