Robson v. Cofield

39 S.E. 472, 113 Ga. 1153, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 525
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 24, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 39 S.E. 472 (Robson v. Cofield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robson v. Cofield, 39 S.E. 472, 113 Ga. 1153, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 525 (Ga. 1901).

Opinion

Eish, J.

Where one person enters upon the premises of another under a contract by the terms of which the relation of landlord and cropper arises between them, the subsequent failure or refusal of the former to comply with the stipulations of his contract as to malting a crop does not render him a tenant at will of the landlord, and, as such, subject to be dispossessed under a summary warrant. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Warrant of eviction. Before Judge Brinson. Washington superior court. September 4, 1900. J. A. Robson, by J. K. Hines, for plaintiff. Evans & Evans, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tapley v. Youmans
97 S.E.2d 365 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Collier Inc. v. Buice
136 S.E. 287 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 S.E. 472, 113 Ga. 1153, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robson-v-cofield-ga-1901.