Robostelli v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.

34 F. 507, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2326

This text of 34 F. 507 (Robostelli v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robostelli v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 34 F. 507, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2326 (circtsdny 1888).

Opinion

LacoMbe, J.

The clerk should not have entered judgment for any sum other than what the verdict and statute called for, and his action in that respect must be set aside. The court undoubtedly possesses the power to regulate the amount of its own judgments, even though by so doing the recovery is reduced below the amount to which appellate jurisdiction attaches, ([Bank v. Redick, 110 U. S. 224, 3 Sup. Ct. Rep. 610, and cases cited;) but that function is to be exercised by the court, not by the clerk. The judgment entered upon the verdict is set aside, with leave to plaintiff to move before the judge who tried the case lor permission to enter judgment without interest or costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. Redick
110 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 F. 507, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robostelli-v-new-york-n-h-h-r-co-circtsdny-1888.