Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Robo Enterprises, Inc. v. Aversa

Robo Enterprises, Inc. v. Aversa

192 A.D.2d 1139, 598 N.Y.S.2d 743
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 14, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.D.2d 1139 (Robo Enterprises, Inc. v. Aversa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robo Enterprises, Inc. v. Aversa, 192 A.D.2d 1139, 598 N.Y.S.2d 743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Motion to expedite appeal denied as unnecessary. Memorandum: The motion to place the appeal on the calendar is unnecessary. The attorney for respondent Edward Jones states that respondents’ briefs will be filed and served by April 13, 1993, the deadline for the filing of respondents’ briefs for the May term. It is the practice of the Court to place cases on the term calendar if respondents’ briefs are timely filed for that term, even where appellants’ briefs have been filed later than the deadline for the filing of appellants’ briefs. Present— Pine, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed Mar. 23,1993.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 A.D.2d 1139, 598 N.Y.S.2d 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robo-enterprises-inc-v-aversa-nyappdiv-1993.