Robo Enterprises, Inc. v. Aversa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robo Enterprises, Inc. v. Aversa

192 A.D.2d 1139, 598 N.Y.S.2d 743

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 14, 1993·Published

Opinion

—Motion to expedite appeal denied as unnecessary. Memorandum: The motion to place the appeal on the calendar is unnecessary. The attorney for respondent Edward Jones states that respondents’ briefs will be filed and served by April 13, 1993, the deadline for the filing of respondents’ briefs for the May term. It is the practice of the Court to place cases on the term calendar if respondents’ briefs are timely filed for that term, even where appellants’ briefs have been filed later than the deadline for the filing of appellants’ briefs. Present— Pine, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed Mar. 23,1993.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion to expedite appeal denied as unnecessary. Memorandum: The motion to place the appeal on the calendar is unnecessary. The attorney for respondent Edward Jones states that respondents’ briefs will be filed and served by April 13, 1993, the deadline for the filing of respondents’ briefs for the May term. It is the practice of the Court to place cases on the term calendar if respondents’ briefs are timely filed for that term, even where appellants’ briefs have been filed later than the deadline for the filing of appellants’ briefs. Present— Pine, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed Mar. 23,1993.)

Robo Enterprises, Inc. v. Aversa, 192 A.D.2d 1139, 598 N.Y.S.2d 743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

192 A.D.2d 1139 (Robo Enterprises, Inc. v. Aversa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.