Robles v. Sturdinvant

Fourth Circuit

Robles v. Sturdinvant

583 F. App'x 129

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 8, 2014·No. No. 14-6523·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Oscar Robles appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Robles’s motions for preparation of transcript at government expense and for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. Robles v. Sturdinvant, No. 7:14-cv-00070-JLK-RSB (W.D.Va. Mar. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Oscar Robles appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Robles’s motions for preparation of transcript at government expense and for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. Robles v. Sturdinvant, No. 7:14-cv-00070-JLK-RSB (W.D.Va. Mar. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Robles v. Sturdinvant, 583 F. App'x 129 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

583 F. App'x 129 (Robles v. Sturdinvant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related