Robles v. Schriro
This text of 278 F. App'x 783 (Robles v. Schriro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
This is an appeal of the district court’s order denying without prejudice appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status.
A review of the record, the opening brief, and the response to the court’s March 24, 2008 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s order.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 F. App'x 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robles-v-schriro-ca9-2008.