Robles v. Microtech Contracting Corp.
This text of 90 A.D.3d 531 (Robles v. Microtech Contracting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court properly exercised its discretion in severing the second third-party action against Tokio Marine from the main action to avoid the prejudice that would result from the jury’s awareness of the existence of liability insurance (see Kelly v Yannotti, 4 NY2d 603, 607 [1958]; Chunn v New York City Hous. Auth., 55 AD3d 437 [2008]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Freedman, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.3d 531, 934 N.Y.2d 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robles-v-microtech-contracting-corp-nyappdiv-2011.