Robles v. Merrill Lynch/WFC/L, Inc.
This text of 40 A.D.3d 412 (Robles v. Merrill Lynch/WFC/L, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered August 21, 2006, which denied defendants’ motion to compel the further deposition of plaintiff’s social worker, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion granted.
The motion to compel the further deposition of plaintiff’s social worker should have been granted. Plaintiff waived the relevant privilege (CPLR 4508) by alleging injuries in her bill of particulars that affirmatively placed her mental condition in issue (see Koump v Smith, 25 NY2d 287, 294 [1969]). Concur— Marlow, J.P., Nardelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 A.D.3d 412, 835 N.Y.S.2d 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robles-v-merrill-lynchwfcl-inc-nyappdiv-2007.