Robles v. Levintan
191 N.E.2d 290, 13 N.Y.2d 642, 240 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1237
This text of 191 N.E.2d 290 (Robles v. Levintan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Robles v. Levintan, 191 N.E.2d 290, 13 N.Y.2d 642, 240 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1237 (N.Y. 1963).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld and Burke. Judges Van Voorhis, Foster and Scileppi dissent as to the affirmance of the judgment against Holland Terminal Corporation upon the ground that, as a matter of law, no causal negligence has been shown upon its part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
191 N.E.2d 290, 13 N.Y.2d 642, 240 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robles-v-levintan-ny-1963.