Robles v. Coughlin
195 A.D.2d 1004, 601 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7807
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robles v. Coughlin. Read the opinion of the Court — 191 A.D.2d 1037 →
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Because petitioner’s argument on appeal challenging the constitutionality of the rule governing administrative appeals was raised in his article 78 petition, it is properly before this Court (cf., Matter of Zaro v Coughlin, 195 AD2d 1003 [decided herewith]). We have determined, however, that petitioner’s argument lacks merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.—Article 78.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robles v. Coughlin, 195 A.D.2d 1004, 601 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).
195 A.D.2d 1004 (Robles v. Coughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zaro v. Coughlin
195 A.D.2d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)