Robles v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robles v. Coombe

238 A.D.2d 628, 656 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3166

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 238 A.D.2d 628 (Robles v. Coombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robles v. Coombe, 238 A.D.2d 628, 656 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit assault, interference with a facility employee, damaging State property and committing an unhygienic act (i.e., throwing feces at another inmate). Petitioner refused to participate in the disciplinary hearing af[629]*629ter his request for a translator was denied. Our review of the record discloses that petitioner did not need the services of a translator as he was sufficiently fluent in English to understand and knowledgeably participate in the hearing (see, Matter of Polanco v Coughlin, 196 AD2d 943). Our review of the record leads us to conclude that petitioner’s due process rights were honored throughout the disciplinary process and that the determination of his guilt was based upon substantial evidence.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit assault, interference with a facility employee, damaging State property and committing an unhygienic act (i.e., throwing feces at another inmate). Petitioner refused to participate in the disciplinary hearing af[629]*629ter his request for a translator was denied. Our review of the record discloses that petitioner did not need the services of a translator as he was sufficiently fluent in English to understand and knowledgeably participate in the hearing (see, Matter of Polanco v Coughlin, 196 AD2d 943). Our review of the record leads us to conclude that petitioner’s due process rights were honored throughout the disciplinary process and that the determination of his guilt was based upon substantial evidence.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D.2d 628, 656 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robles-v-coombe-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack