Robles v. Ascan Welding Service, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robles v. Ascan Welding Service, Inc.

200 A.D.2d 564, 608 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 175

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 10, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 200 A.D.2d 564 (Robles v. Ascan Welding Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robles v. Ascan Welding Service, Inc., 200 A.D.2d 564, 608 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 175 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated July 10, 1991, as granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to present any proof that a triable issue of material fact existed. Even accepting the plaintiff’s proof as true, the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of negligence against the defendants. Rather, the proof established that the plaintiff’s own negligence was the sole proximate cause of his injuries. Therefore, the Supreme Court did not err in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated July 10, 1991, as granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to present any proof that a triable issue of material fact existed. Even accepting the plaintiff’s proof as true, the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of negligence against the defendants. Rather, the proof established that the plaintiff’s own negligence was the sole proximate cause of his injuries. Therefore, the Supreme Court did not err in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.D.2d 564, 608 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robles-v-ascan-welding-service-inc-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack