Robles Ibarra v. Garland
This text of Robles Ibarra v. Garland (Robles Ibarra v. Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 23-60083 Document: 00516814493 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/10/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 23-60083 FILED Summary Calendar July 10, 2023 ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Juan Carlos Robles Ibarra,
Petitioner,
versus
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General,
Respondent. ______________________________
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A091 284 252 ______________________________
Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Juan Carlos Robles Ibarra, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upholding the denial of his application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). The BIA determined that he was ineligible for such relief because his prior Texas conviction for attempted burglary of a habitation was an
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-60083 Document: 00516814493 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/10/2023
No. 23-60083
aggravated felony pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G) and (U). See § 1229b(a)(3). We review the BIA’s decision and consider the immigration judge’s decision only to the extent it influenced the BIA. Rodriguez Gonzalez v. Garland, 61 F.4th 467, 469 (5th Cir. 2023). Whether a conviction qualifies as an aggravated felony presents a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Garcia v. Holder, 756 F.3d 839, 842 (5th Cir. 2014). We have jurisdiction to review the question pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). See Fosu v. Garland, 36 F.4th 634, 636-37 (5th Cir. 2022). Under circuit precedent, the offense of burglary of a habitation under Texas Penal Code § 30.02 falls within the generic definition of burglary for purposes of the categorical approach. United States v. Herrold, 941 F.3d 173, 175-77, 182 (5th Cir. 2019) (en banc); United States v. Wallace, 964 F.3d 386, 388-90 (5th Cir. 2020). Accordingly, a § 30.02 offense for which the sentence was at least one year of imprisonment, as Robles Ibarra’s sentence was, qualifies as an aggravated felony under § 1101(a)(43)(G). See § 1101(a)(43)(G); Herrold, 941 F.3d at 175-77, 182; Wallace, 964 F.3d at 388- 90. Furthermore, Robles Ibarra’s conviction was an aggravated felony even though he was convicted only of attempted burglary of a habitation. See § 1101(a)(43)(U); Rodriguez Gonzalez, 61 F.4th at 470. He argues that a violation of § 30.02(a)(3) falls outside the generic definition of burglary because § 30.02(a)(3) lacks the requisite element of intent to commit a crime. The argument is unavailing, as it was addressed and rejected in Wallace, 964 F.3d at 388-90. The BIA did not err in determining that his Texas conviction for attempted burglary of a habitation constituted an aggravated felony pursuant to § 1101(a)(43)(G) and (U). Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robles Ibarra v. Garland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robles-ibarra-v-garland-ca5-2023.