Robles-Doroteo v. Mukasey
This text of 258 F. App'x 936 (Robles-Doroteo v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Marin Robles-Doroteo and his wife Martha Heroína Gomez-Santos, natives [937]*937and citizens of Peru, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing as untimely their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying asylum and withholding of removal. Pursuant to the REAL ID Act of 2005, we construe Petitioners’ transferred habeas petition as a petition for review. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 928-29 (9th Cir.2005). We dismiss the petition for review.
We do not consider Petitioners’ contentions because they were the subject of a previous petition for review. See Robles-Doroteo v. Ashcroft, 81 Fed.Appx. 253 (9th Cir.2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 F. App'x 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robles-doroteo-v-mukasey-ca9-2007.