Robison v. Walter
174 A.D. 896, 159 N.Y.S. 1139
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 174 A.D. 896 (Robison v. Walter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Robison v. Walter, 174 A.D. 896, 159 N.Y.S. 1139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
The defendant should state what deeds, other than those set out in the answer, he relies upon to show restrictive covenants and agreements. If he will offer no others at the trial he may so state. The order is reversed, without costs, and the motion so far as stated granted, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
174 A.D. 896, 159 N.Y.S. 1139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robison-v-walter-nyappdiv-1916.