Robison v. State
224 S.W. 894, 88 Tex. Crim. 17, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 325
Opinion
Appellant was convicted for refusing to dip his cattle and fined $25.
The main question in the case relied upon has been disposed of favorable to appellant in Ex parte Leslie, 87 Texas Crim. Rep., 476, 223 S. W. Rep., 227. Under the decision in that case we feel that it is unnecessary to discuss at length the-issues involved. That case was thoroughly considered, and upon review of it we have seen no reason to change our opinion.
The judgment will be reversed and the cause dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robison v. State, 224 S.W. 894, 88 Tex. Crim. 17, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 325 (Tex. 1920).
224 S.W. 894 (Robison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Leslie
223 S.W. 227 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)